Riley Home Page 

report_but2.gif (4270 bytes) 
   

To receive 
The Riley Report
free by e-mail, please refer to the introductory paragraph on the right.
 

Back Issues

February 2006

November 2005

October 2005

August 2005

July 2005

June 2005

February 2005

November 2004

August 2004

July 2004

June 2004

March 2004

February 2004

December 2003

October 2003

June 2003

May 2003

March 2003

January 2003

 December 2002

October 2002

August 2002

June 2002

March 2002

December 2001

September 2001

August 2001 

June 2001 

April 2001 

Feb 2001 

Sept 2000 

April 2000 

March 2000 

January 2000 

November 1999 

October 1999 

July 1999 

HomeServicesWhat's new?SeminarsPublicationsContact us

 

THE RILEY REPORT - June 2006

from Thomas B. Riley   RTRiley6@cs.com

www.rileyis.com  
www.electronicgov.net

Following is the Riley Report for June 2006.  Please feel free to pass this on as you see fit.  If you wish to use any part of the Report in an offline publication please acknowledge the author or contact the author for permission if it is to be fully republished offline.  If you are not currently subscribed to the Riley Report (there is no charge) you may email RTRiley6@cs.com and simply put "subscribe" in the body of the text.  

This month's report assesses the importance of e-governance in relation to achieving success in e-government applications. This phenomenon is resulting in new challenges to governments whose citizens want access to government through an array of technologies, not simply web access.


E-GOVERNMENT VS. E-GOVERNANCE

Differentiating the two Concepts

 
e-Government and e-governance can be defined as two very distinct terms.  e-Governance is a broader topic that deals with the whole spectrum of the relationship and networks within government regarding the usage and application of ICTs.  e-Government is actually a narrower approach dealing with the development of online services to the citizen, more the e on any particular government service - such as e-tax, e-transportation or e-health.  e-Governance is a wider concept that defines and assesses the impacts that technologies are having on the practice and administration of governments.  It also includes the relationship between public servants and the wider society, such as dealings with the elected bodies or outside groups, like not-for-profit organizations, NGOs, academic institutions or private sector corporate entities.  e-Governance encompasses a series of necessary steps for government agencies to develop and administer in order to ensure successful implementation of e-government services to the public at large. The differences between these two important concepts are explored further in this essay.

The Basis of the Service

e-Government is an institutional approach to jurisdictional political and program operations. e-Governance is a  procedural approach to co-operative administrative relations, i.e. the encompassing of basic and standard procedures within the confines of public administration.  It is the latter that acts as the lynchpin that will ensure success of the delivery of e-services.

The "e" part of both e-government and e-governance stands for the electronic platform or infrastructure that enables and supports the networking of public policy development and deployment.  It is by now widely acknowledged that the original impetus for acquiring and using electronic apparatus in government and governance arose from the earlier successes with the same kind of strategy in commerce.  e-Commerce had previously rested on credit and debit card processing for purchases, and on faxing of bulk orders and subsequent invoices in business-to-business transactions.  In Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom, for example, the emergence of e-commerce by the private sector helped to stimulate and drive the evolution of e-government within departments and agencies.  At the political leadership level it was clear that e-commerce was reflecting the enormous changes taking place in the economies of countries in the developed world.

The transformation of the Internet from an academic research network to a publicly accessible information utility prompted increasing numbers of businesses to create a "web presence".  The initial postings were mostly electronic advertising brochures and product catalogues, with invitations to "order by phone".  As e-commerce came to the fore it became apparent to governments that customer expectations were moving in the direction of greater speed and convenience for transactions; so direct ordering through the Internet was developed and launched.  The only issue that still inhibits the public from taking full advantage of e-commerce, is the concern with security of information and funds, a challenge that is also reflected in e-government and e-governance. The success of e-commerce drove governments to realize that citizens were now able to undertake transactions online, and were also capable of using email as an important communications tool that sped up and changed the way they communicated with each other.  The evolution of the worldwide web in the early 1990s created expectations that if businesses and the population at large could engage in online commerce and share knowledge and information in ways never before conceived, then it was incumbent on governments to provide online services.  This phenomenon was a case of governments having to respond to a cultural change in the way people dealt with each other and with groups in society on an international basis.  The high expectations of change resulted, by the mid-1990s, in rapid development of e-government services.

In essence, because the public liked e-commerce when it worked properly, they began to want their governments to perform in the same way.  In terms of services provided, e-government and e-governance developed along the same trajectory as had e-commerce previously.  The internal operational aspects of e-commerce included rationalizing supply chains and business rules.  This aspect was referred to as "back office" requirements in government, and it focused around rationalized workflow and information sharing. 

The external offerings of e-government and e-governance started with making policy documents available electronically.  Both "stand-alone" studies and on-going series (newsletters, press releases, etc.) were posted and could be printed out as hard copies or stored electronically by whoever in the public was accessing them.  The second phase of electronic products and services consisted of on-line electronic forms, either to exchange information (census forms, etc.) or to conduct transactions (purchase documents, pay user fees, submit tax returns, etc.).  The third phase, now just emerging, involves consultation on issues of concern, and participation in policy making and regulatory administration.

The point of the above mini-history is to demonstrate that, in terms of the electronic platform and its operations, there are parallels between electronics for governing and e-commerce, and between e-government and e-governance.  The computers, cables, software languages, and communications protocols, are standardized products for any kind of electronic networking, regardless of its information content or organizational context.  What differentiates e-commerce from electronic governing, and e-government from e-governance is the purpose and functions that such networking supports.  e-Commerce is premised on profitable transactions, whereas e-government provides public services, and e-governance facilitates appropriate behaviour.  So, in each case, the motivation and the mandate will be distinct.

The advancement and continuous growth of e-governance and e-government is reliant on the abilities of governments to continually change and to take into account the new technologies that are constantly coming onto the market.  This phenomenon is resulting in new challenges to governments whose citizens want access to government through an array of technologies, not simply web access.  This is especially difficult for public sector agencies in the developed world where, in many jurisdictions, e-government is taken as a given and governments have moved on to other priorities.  But whatever the reason, the important fact is that good governance implies that changing priorities in our evolving culture require responses to the new technologies and to the way e-services are delivered.  

The full paper on this subject, which goes into greater depth, written by Thomas B. Riley and William Sheridan at the Commonwealth Centre for e-Governance, can be found at: www.electronicgov.net/pubs/research_papers/SheridanRileyComparEgov.shtml

You can also click here to obtain the paper entitled 'Comparing e-Governance and e-Government' on this site.  


Thomas Riley is available for consultations, preparation of reports, presenting workshops or delivering speeches at conferences and seminars on e-government, e-governance and e-democracy.  Please contact me at the email address below for further details.


Thomas B. Riley
Executive Director and Chair
Commonwealth Centre for E-Governance
www.electronicgov.net
Visiting Professor, University of Glasgow
President, Riley Information Services Inc.
www.rileyis.com
email: rtriley6@cs.com
Author: Time's End
www.amazon.com (see under books: Thomas B. Riley)


With author attribution, this document may be freely copied in whole or in part for online distribution. Any offline use requires the author's permission.